Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

US Tax Disputes

Keeping an eye on US tax controversy and litigation developments.

open menu close menu

US Tax Disputes

  • Home
  • About us
  • Property Tax
  • State and Local (Subnational) Taxation

Kentucky: Century Aluminum Decision Provides Clarity on the Kentucky Manufacturing Sales Tax Exemption

By Mark A. Loyd, Bailey Roese, Stephanie Bruns, and Collier Clay
December 29, 2022
  • General
  • State and Local Taxation
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

The Kentucky Supreme Court held that certain items purchased by Century Aluminum and consumed in its manufacturing process were tax-exempt supplies, not taxable repair, replacement or spare parts. Century Aluminum of Kentucky, GP v. Department of Revenue, 2021-SC-0300-DG (Ky. December 15, 2022) (designated to be published). ). In holding for the taxpayer, the Court reversed the Court of Appeals’ opinion affirming the Franklin Circuit Court and remanded the case to the Kentucky Claims Commission (“KCC”), now the Board of Tax Appeals, for reinstatement of its Final Order. Century is an aluminum manufacturer in Hawesville, Hancock County, Kentucky.

From November 2010 to May 2015, as part of its aluminum manufacturing business, “Century purchased anode stubs, Inductotherm lining, thermocouples and tube assemblies, and welding wire and industrial gases from Kentucky vendors in the relevant time period.” Id. at 2. Although vendors initially collected sales tax from Century on the items and remitted the tax to the Department, Century subsequently concluded these items were properly characterized as tax-exempt supplies, not taxable repair, replacement or spare parts, and filed refund requests for these purchases. Id. The Department denied the refund requests and issued a Final Ruling Letter for each vendor, which Century (as assignee of the vendors rights in the refund requests) appealed to the KCC. Id. at 2-3.

At the KCC, Century argued that each item was necessary to the manufacturing process and had a limited useful life. The Department argued that if items which meet the qualification of a tax-exempt supply also meet the definition of a taxable part, then they will be held taxable. Id. at 2-6. Both parties produced witnesses to support their claims. Id. at 3.

The KCC determined that the anode stubs, Inductotherm lining, thermocouples and tube assemblies, and welding wire and industrial gases used for welding are tax-exempt supplies under KRS 139.470(10)(a)2.b. Id. at 6-7. The KCC rejected the Department’s interpretation, which would allow most tangible personal property meeting the criteria for a tax-exempt supply to be also categorized as a taxable part, and concluded that the test for final categorization is whether the item is intended to be used up in the manufacturing process or simply wears out. Id. at 6. Under this test, the KCC determined that the items at issue would be categorized as tax-exempt. Id. at 7. The Department appealed.

On appeal, the Franklin County Circuit Court reversed the KCC, and was affirmed by the Kentucky Court of Appeals. The circuit court agreed with the Department finding the items were introduced to maintain, restore, mend, or repair machinery or equipment used at Century’s facility, and were therefore taxable under KRS 139.470(10). Id. at 9-10. The Court of Appeals, like the circuit court, concluded that KRS 139.470(10) and KRS 139.010(26) are not in conflict and do not need to be harmonized, making Century’s proposed test unnecessary. Id. at 10-11. In addition to the two parties’ merit briefs, amici curiae Kentucky Association of Manufacturers and Kentucky Chamber of Commerce filed briefs with the Kentucky Supreme Court as well.

The Court acknowledged that “[c]ategorization of an item as a supply is…at the heart of this dispute.” Id. at 15. In reversing the Court of Appeals, the Kentucky Supreme Court agreed with the KCC’s “ultimate conclusion that a distinguishing difference between a tax-exempt supply and a taxable part is whether the tangible personal property is consumed in the manufacturing process and has a useful life less than one year,” [id. at 12-13], noting that its decision was “based upon the plain language of the statutes.” Id. at 12. The Court explained that in order to be categorized as a supply, an item must be (i) tangible personal property that is (ii) consumed when used in the manufacturing or industrial processing and is directly used in such processing, and (iii) having a useful life of less than one year. Id. at 15-16 (citing KRS 139.470(10)). The Court explained that, “upon consideration of the statutory language as a whole, that plain language incorporates the principles expressed in Mansbach and Century Indemnity.” Id. at 20 (citing Mansbach Metal Co. v. Dep’t of Revenue, 521 S.W.2d 85, 87 (Ky. 1975), and Century Indemnity Co. of Chicago, Ill. v. Shunk Mfg. Co., 68 S.W.2d 772, 774 (Ky. 1934). Among these principles, the Court included one that was referenced in the Amic Curiae Brief filed by the Kentucky Association of Manufacturers and joined by the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce, that “a distinction could be drawn between materials and supplies and parts, that distinction being that materials and supplies are designed and intended to be used up in the manufacturing process and parts simply wear out.” Century Aluminum, supra, at 18, (citing Mansbach, 521 S.W.2d at 86-87) (emphasis added); see also Amici Curiae Brief, at 10, n.5. The Court therefore agreed with the KCC’s ultimate finding that the items were categorized as tax exempt because all items at issue were tangible personal property that had direct use in manufacturing in a manufacturing facility and had a useful life of less than one year.

This decision impacts all Kentucky manufacturers. As explained in the Amici Curiae Brief , manufacturing is undisputedly the “economic engine” of Kentucky, accounting for 17.8% of the total output in the state and employing 13.29% of the workforce; the total output from manufacturing in Kentucky was $38.33 billion in 2019. Amic Curiae Brief, supra, at 1. Every manufacturer with a plant in Kentucky purchases supplies used in their manufacturing operations to which the manufacturing supplies exemption of KRS 139.470(9)(b)2.b may apply to exempt such supplies for sales and use tax purposes. Accordingly, this particular exemption is of widespread application and importance to many Kentucky taxpayers. Now, those taxpayers have clarity on the supply exemption’s scope.

The authors, Mark A. Loyd, Bailey Roese, Stephanie Bruns and Collier Clay, and their law firm, represent Amic , Kentucky Association of Manufacturers and the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce.

December 29, 2022

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Mark A. Loyd

About Mark A. Loyd

Mark A. Loyd, co-leader of Dentons' national Tax practice group, has decades of experience successfully resolving his clients’ state, local and federal tax issues. Elected as a Fellow of the American College of Tax Counsel, a distinction reserved for America’s very best tax attorneys, Mark is also Martindale-Hubbell AV® Preeminent™ Rated, the highest rating available, and has been selected as a Super Lawyer since 2015. Leveraging his extensive career in industry and CPA background, Mark has averted, managed and resolved sales, property, income and excise tax and licensing issues through audit management, administrative protest or settlement, and when necessary, through tax litigation in administrative tribunals, state courts and appellate courts, including the US Supreme Court. He’s licensed to practice in Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio, Tennessee, federal district and appellate courts as well as the US Court of International Trade.

All posts Full bio

Bailey Roese

About Bailey Roese

Bailey Roese is a partner in the Firm's Louisville office and represents taxpayers in federal, state, and local tax controversies. Selected as a Kentucky Super Lawyers® Rising Star for 2018 and 2019 in the area of Tax law, Bailey regularly advocates for clients in the state courts and administrative tribunals of Kentucky, Ohio and Indiana, as well as the United States Tax Court.

All posts Full bio

Stephanie Bruns

About Stephanie Bruns

Stephanie's practice includes state and local tax planning and income, sales, and excise tax, as well as property tax and tax controversy. Stephanie also assists with federal tax planning, business formation issues, and captive controversy.

All posts Full bio

Collier Clay

About Collier Clay

Collier practice includes state and local tax.

While in law school, Collier was actively involved with the Kentucky Law Journal, serving as Senior Staff Editor, Staff Editor and on the Student Note and Disciplinary committees.

RELATED POSTS

  • General
  • State and Local Taxation

Kentucky Tax Developments: Fall 2022

By Mark A. Loyd, Bailey Roese, and Stephanie Bruns
  • Employee Retention Credits
  • General
  • IRS
  • Tax Credits

Employee Retention Credit Refund Suits: Why Taxpayers Are Bringing Tax Refund Suits to Expedite Unprocessed Refund Claims

By Mark A. Loyd, Gregory Rhodes, and Helen Cooper
  • Examination
  • FATCA
  • FBAR
  • General
  • Individual Taxation
  • IRS
  • IRS Administration
  • Offshore Reporting
  • OVDP

IRS to end Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program in September

By Jeff Erney

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Additional resources

Visit our Global tax guide to doing business in... 2024.

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site